Interesting Information: Chewing Gum Disaster

Interesting Information:  March 27, 2013

Chewing Gum Disaster

I love chewing gum.

Always have.

I probably got that love from my mother.  She used to read in bed at night, and you could always tell how excited the book was by the speed with which she popped the gum in her mouth.

Gum today has some exciting flavors and names, like Wrigley’s “Rain…a tingling spearmint.”  And the packages are colorful and beg to be picked up and chewed.

The other day, though, I noticed that “Rain” had a warning on the cellophane wrapper (NOT on the actual box) that the package contained a chemical called phenylalanine.  Hmmmm.  What is that?

That’s when I looked closer at the label.

Aspartame.  Soy Lecithin.  Sorbitol.  Natural and artificial flavors.

Where was the plain old sugar?

This was not a sugarless gum…

OK.  I’ll just get Juicy Fruit or one of the “normal” older gums.

Aspartame.

Aspartame is in ALL THE GUMS AT THE DRUGSTORE.

I had to go to a health food store to get a plain old gum with plain old sugar.

Aspartame is a neurotoxin.  Dr. Russel Blaylock calls it an excitotoxin and puts it right alongside MSG.  Blaylock claims excitotoxins promote cancer growth and the metastasis of cancer cells.  He cites a life time Italian study that links leukemia and aspartame.  The internet is full of testimonials from people whose health issues had reduced them to wheelchairs and who stopped drinking diet drinks filled with aspartame and who got their health back.  Military pilots are cautioned not to use it before flying planes.

I wrote about the history of aspartame and how it got FDA approval and what it does to humans in Tipping Points 19 and 20.  It’s another shoddy, terrible tale of regulatory agencies bought off by industry and of a total disregard for science or for the health of humans.  Aspartame has NEVER BEEN SHOWN TO BE SAFE.  There is plenty of information showing that IT IS DANGEROUS.

ALL the gum in the stores…

And what about phenylalanine?  In its natural form, it’s an amino acid that shows up in places like breast milk.  It can really harm people who can’t process it.  There have been enough of those folks that the gum is labeled for it.  The pheylalanine is gum has got to be a synthetic chemical brew, so who knows what effect it has on us.  Phenylalanine is reputed to be an analgesic and an antidepressant, so it kills pain and makes you feel happy.  The FDA allows it in foods as an additive and as a NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENT, which just shows you how far gone our food system is now.   So, the chewing gum industry is using it because it’s addictive and can kill pain, aren’t they?

And what’s soy lecithin doing in gum???

EVERY SINGLE GUM IN A MAINSTREAM STORE…

Chemical brews, not real food.

Don’t buy it.  Don’t chew it.  Understand what’s gone so terribly wrong with our food system.

Interesting Information: Blog Review: 2012 in review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2012 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

4,329 films were submitted to the 2012 Cannes Film Festival. This blog had 35,000 views in 2012. If each view were a film, this blog would power 8 Film Festivals

Click here to see the complete report.

Turkey Tracks: Fox With Foot Fetish

Turkey Tracks:  November 18, 2012

Fox With Foot Fetish

We’ve had a few chuckles over this information.

You might remember that we lost two chickens to a fox about six weeks or so ago.  Our whole neighborhood had seen her/him from time to time.  Susan McBride and Chris Richmond, up at Golden Brook Farm, thought for a few days fox had gotten one of their sweet, new barn cats.  And, they breathed a sigh of relief when they took their crop of meat chickens to be slaughtered without any loss along the way.

Things died down, then neighbor Marina Schauffler sent me this post:

In case you’re in need of a little humor, here’s an update on the neighborhood fox thief. Your chickens aren’t the only victims. I have now lost FIVE shoes to our fox friend. I kick off shoes on our back porch and noticed that one (then two, then three) were missing, but thought the boys had knocked them off or moved them. When a hiking boot went missing this morning, I hopped online and found that there are foxes with a foot fetish—who steal shoes for their pups to play with! One in Germany got nicknamed Imelda (after Imelda Marcos) ‘cause she ran off with 120 shoes in one community! I have to laugh (even though it’s going to be costly replacing them!)—I wish I could have seen her hauling off the half-pound hiking boot!

My chickens are loose again.

So far, so good…

Interesting Information: Just Say “NO” to Hand-wash Chemicals

Interesting Information:  November 11, 2012

Just Say “NO” to Hand-Wash Chemicals

I was looking for a fermented beet recipe in Sandor Ellix Katz’s WILD FERMENTATION when I realized I had marked a passage about using antibacterial soaps, most of which contain Triclosan or Triclocarban.  Katz’s book is all about using organisms of fermentation to create living foods.  As such, he argues that these organisms “play a role in protecting us, as organisms among organisms, from disease” (8).

Triclosan has been classified as a pesticide by the EPA since 1969, though it is more often used in products that promote the “body hygiene,” with which we are obsessed.  Here’s the EPA site since googling reveals that there are a number of internet sites trying to deny this classification of triclosan:  http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/REDs/factsheets/triclosan_fs.htm.   One does not really want to think that one is putting a pesticide on one’s skin or in one’s mouth (toothpaste).

The Natural Resources Defense council’s page on the dangers of triclosan is a good place to start understanding how dangerous it is.  Triclosan may cause antibiotic resistance in humans and definitely encourages the growth of “superbugs” and disrupts hormones, particularly in the brain and the reproductive systems:  http://www.nrdc.org/living/chemicalindex/triclosan.asp?gclid=CPyh97ewx7MCFcxAMgod0n4AQg.

I was fairly astonished at the extensive use of triclosan in all kinds of products.  Dr. Ben Kim has assembled an astonishing list of these products: http://drbenkim.com/articles/triclosan-products.htm.  One might expect triclosan in soap, but it’s also in toothpaste and all kinds of cosmetics–and that’s just the beginning.  Do take a look at Kim’s list–it’s in first-aid products, clothing, toys, kitchen equipment…

If the terms “antibacterial” or “antimicrobial” appear on a label, start looking deeper for Triclosan on the main ingredient label.

And, if you’re somewhere where you’ve used a toilet that has one of those hand-wash dispensers that substitute for soap and water–you might want to forgo using it.  What may or may not be on your hands is far less dangerous than the chemical you’re about to use.  Maybe carry “wipes” that are less dangerous?

As I said, Americans are obsessed with germs and body hygiene–which dates back to the divergence between germ-theory proponents and immune-system proponents AND to the market’s ability to make products that seem to quiet our fears about germs and pathogens–a fear the market exploits.  I explored this history in Mainely Tipping Points 8 Essay, with regard to the safety of real milk versus the dead commercial milk, which is on this blog.  (You can get to the essays by clicking on the right sidebar or by searching from the search bottom on the right sidebar ).  And, that’s where Katz and his WILD FERMENTATION come back into play.  It’s worth reading Katz’s take on this whole subject, from which I quote below.  (Note:   Katz cites all his quotes in the text.)

Our culture is terrified of germs and obsessed with hygiene.  The more we glean about disease-causing viruses, bacteria, and other microorganisms, the more we fear exposure to all forms of microscopic life.  Every new sensationalized killer microbe gives us more reason to defend ourselves with vigilance  Nothing illustrates this more vividly than the sudden appearance, everywhere in the United States, of antibacterial soap.  Twenty years ago, mass marketing of antibacterial soap was but a glimmer in some pharmaceutical executive’s eye.  It has quickly become the standard hand-washing hygiene product.  Are fewer people getting sick as a result?  “There’s no evidence that they do any good and there’s reason to suspect that they could contribute to a problem by helping to create antibiotic-resistant bacteria,” says Dr. Myron Genel, chair of the American Medical Association’s Council on Scientific Affairs.  Antibacterial soap is just another exploitative and potentially dangerous product being sold by preying on people’s fears.

The antibacterial compounds in these soaps, most commonly triclosan, kill the more susceptible bacteria but not the heartier ones.  “These resistant microbes may include bacteria…that were unable to gain a foothold previously and are now able to thrive thanks to the destruction of competing microbes,” says Dr. Stuart Levy, director of the Tufts University Center for Adaptation Genetics and Drug Resistance.  Your skin, your orifices, and the surfaces of your home are all covered with microorganisms that help protect you (and themselves) from potentially harmful organisms that you both encounter.  Constantly assaulting the bacteria on, in, and around you with antibacterial compounds weakens one line of defense your body uses against disease organisms.

Microorganisms not only protect us by competing with potentially dangerous organisms, they teach the immune system how to function.  “The immune system organizes itself through experience, just like the brain,” says Dr. Irun R. Cohen of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel.  A growing number of researchers are finding evidence to support what is known as “the hygiene hypothesis,” which attributes the dramatic rise in the prevalence of asthma and other allergies to lack of exposure to diverse microorganisms found in soil and untreated water.  “The cleaner we live…the more likely we’ll get asthma and allergies,” states Dr. David Rosenstreich, director of Allergy and Immunology at the Albert Einstein School of Medicine in New York (9).

So, just say “no” to Triclosan as an ingredient in hygiene products and all the other products in which it is found.

And think about all the germ-theory hype a bit more…

Work to build up your immune system…

Interesting Information: Rachael Maddow Show November 7, 2012

Interesting Information:  November 8, 2012

Rachael Maddow Show November 7, 2012

She’s smart.  Really smart.

She’s nice.  Polite to all.

Her November 7, 2012, show analyzed many of the highlights of the Presidential election.

It’s a must see.  Well done, smart, polite, interesting…

You can download the podcast on itunes.

You can stream it at the MSNBC url:   http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show

 

Interesting Information: “Mitt Romney’s Bailout Bonanza”: The Face of Crony Capitalism

Interesting Information:  November 8, 2012

“Mitt Romney’s Bailout Bonanza”:  The Face of Crony Capitalism

Greg Palast’s story in the November 5, 2012, issue of “The Nation” is important because it allows a picture of how crony capitalism works and why it is so exciting that the 99 percent–Americans of all creeds, colors, and genders–voted for Obama in enough numbers for him to win.  They “get” that ultra wealthy people trying to buy an election means even more trouble for the 99 percent.

The full story title is “Mitt Romney’s Bailout Bonanza”:  How Mitt and Ann made millions–and Mitt’s hedge fund donors made billions–from the auto-industry rescue that he condemned.”

Greg Palast is an “economist and financial investigator turned journalist whose series on vulture funds appeared on BBC Television’s Newsnight.”  This work was “supported by the Investigative Fund at the Nation Institute and by the Puffin Foundation.”  Palast’s new book is BILLIONAIRES & BALLOT BANDITS:  HOW TO STEAL AN ELECTION IN 9 EASY STEPS.

You can read the whole piece for yourself at http://www.thenation.com/article/170644/mitt-romneys-bailout-bonanza.  But, here are the highlights.  Be warned:  it’s a nasty story.  But, one that shows how crony capitalists work, how they are parasitic predators.

Mitt and Ann Romney “personally gained at least $15.3 million from the bailout–and a few of Romney’s most important Wall Street donors made more than $4 billion.  Their gains, and the Romneys’, were astronomical–more than 3,000 percent on their investment.”  The Romneys invested “at least $1 million…through Ann Romney’s blind trust (it could be far more, but the Romneys have declined to disclose exactly how much).”

The government bailout sent “directly or indirectly, more than $12.9 billion to Delphi–and to the hedge funds that had gained control over it.”

A key player is the super rich, super conservative “vulture investor” Paul Singer–a long time Romney friend and a long time supporter of Paul Ryan, who voted for the auto bailout.  (Singer was instrumental likely in putting Ryan on the Romney ticket.)  Singer owns one of the hedge funds that gained control of Delphi Automotive–the former General Motors subsidiary “whose auto parts remain essential to GM’s production lines.”  Neither GM or Chrysler can operate without these auto parts.

When the auto industry started running into trouble, it spun off Delphi Automotive, which was loaded with debt.  Delphi went into bankruptcy and Singer and his crony friends–all of them very rich and all of whom have donated millions to the Romney campaign–bought Delphi stock at “20 cents on the dollar of their face value.”  Singer, chair of the “anti-union Manhattan Institute…rid Delphi of every single one of its 25,200 unionized workers” (underline mine).  Singer et al closed all but 4 of the 29 Delphi plants and sent the jobs to China.  Delphi is “now incorporated overseas, leaving the company with 5,000 employees in the United States (versus almost 100,000 abroad).

Delphi retirees lost their health insurance and life insurance and their pensions were “slashed by 40 percent.”  As the hedge funders refused to honor workers’ pensions, the government’s Pension benefit Guaranty Corporation had to take over paying “all of Delphi’s retirement pensions”–which slashed pensions by 40 percent as this organization cannot pay in full.  Retirees found they could not get good jobs to replace this monetary loss.  Romney’s campaign ran ads blaming Obama for the monetary losses to the workers though it was Singer et al who refused to honor Delphi’s obligations to its workers–a practice began in the leverage buyouts of the 1970s–pioneered by men like Mitt Romney.

In June 2009, with “the bailout negotiations in full swing, the hedge funds, under Singer’s lead, used their bonds to buy up a controlling interest in Delphi’s stock….they paid, on average, an equivalent of only 67 cents per share.”

Two years later, in November 2011, “the Singer syndicate took Delphi public at $22 a share, turning an eye-popping profit of more than 3,000 percent.”  This gain of $904 million came from U.S. taxpayer money for the bailout.

Between 2011 and 2012 Delphi’s stock soared 45 percent.  These gains came from Delphi’s more stable situation, yes, but this situation was based on Singer et al’s refusal to honor Delphi’s healthcare and pension obligations AND from the bailout, taxpayer  money.  The various individual crony capitalists in the Singer syndicate have made $390 million (Daniel Loeb), $894 million (two Goldman Sachs alums, $2.6 billion (John Paulson),and $1.2 billion (Singer and his partners).

When President Obama set out to save the failing auto industry, there were at least 25,000 union workers who stood to lose their jobs.  The Delphi hedge fund owners held Delphi hostage, telling the government to “hand over $350 million immediately, `because if you don’t, we’ll shut you down’ “–meaning the whole of the auto industry which needed Delphi’s parts.

At one point in 2009, the government and GM tried to “take back control of Delphi via a joint venture with Platinum Equity,” but the hedge funders refused to sell–seeing that they could make a lot more money by holding the company hostage, sending jobs overseas, cutting retirees pensions and insurance, and so forth.

This year, 2012, Singer et al took the money they had “saved” by not honoring obligations to workers and bought auto plants parts plants in Asia–$972 million–“purchased from Bain Capital.”

Romney’s 2009 tax returns would have shown how much he actually made on this deal.  He refused to release them.

If  Romney had invested as little (for him) as $7.5 million, he would have made $115 million.

Whatever money is involved remains untaxed as Delphi’s incorporation is now in the Isle of Jersey, a “tax haven off the coast of France.”

These men are parasitic predators.

They do not care about workers.

They do not create American jobs.

They did not have any plan for America beyond making it easier for themselves to make these kinds of deals.

There is no such thing as a “free” market.  Just look at all the monopoly formation that is in place.

Good business people build things, honor obligations, and conserve what is important in their communities and their nation.

Interesting Information: Walmart’s Campaign to Fight Hunger

Interesting Information:  October 22, 2012

Walmart’s Campaign to Fight Hunger

A Walmart insert came in our local Camden, Maine, paper last week.

I was horrified by its contents.  And, saddened.

The front page of a four-page sale flyer announced–in big capitals–“ONE IN SIX AMERICANS STRUGGLE WITH HUNGER.”

The background picture (I would try to photo it, but I’m afraid of their copyright laws) shows four children (two African Americans, one with dark hair whose face is turned away, and in the center of the page, a blond white child with big blue eyes) and a “mom” or “teacher” adult.  So, unspoken is that we really have to do something about hungry children, not just hungry Americans.  (The last time I looked, childhood hunger was one in five children–and if Walmart paid better wages, they could help that problem immensely.)

In the foreground are 2 apples, four raspberries, six oranges, and a bunch of about 6 bananas.  Behind them–and filling the rest of the pages–are boxes of horrible, fake, sugary, unhealthy foods:  Honey Nut Cheerios, Kellogg’s Frosted Flakes, Country Crock margarine, Jell-O Oreo Dirt Cup, Knorr Pasta with Chicken, Knoss Rice with Cheddar and Broccoli, a box of Hamburger Helper that promises seven meals, Kellogg’s Special K (really, there’s nothing in that box that’s good for you–see my Mainely Tipping Points essays), and Nature Valley cereal bars.

The other three sheets are more of the same kind of fake foods.  The only fresh foods are the token fruits on the front page–and they aren’t on sale in the flyer.

The logos of General Mills, Unilever, Kraft Foods, and ConAgra Foods are on the cover page.

Meanwhile, the government and the medical community and all the public health folks are running around screaming about the obesity epidemic.  Really, they don’t need to look any farther than this Walmart flyer.  Here’s what is massively wrong and why so many folks are obese.  They’re eating TOO MANY CARBOHYDRATES and fake foods, like the ones “on sale” in this ad.

Don’t for one minute think that Walmart cares about obesity or children.  Or, that Walmart is NOT making a huge profit on a sale like this one.  There is not one philanthropic bone in this corporation’s structure.  And, according to Tracie McMillan in THE AMERICAN WAY OF EATING (more on this book later), Walmart already controls 25 percent of the grocery market in America and is now threatening expansion that will harm inner city markets and urban farming efforts.  Don’t think Walmart will always keep prices low as they get more of a market share either.  They won’t.

So, don’t fall for this kind of appeal.

Don’t be a part of feeding hungry kids or your kids or yourself this kind of unhealthy food.  Find other ways to help feed the hungry and to eat yourself.  There’s plenty of help out there for you to learn how NOT to use these boxed fake foods.

Most of all, don’t shop at Walmart.  Yes, some things may be momentarily cheaper at Walmart, but there are huge costs in all kinds of ways in the Walmart model.  Walmart is part of why we have hungry children in America in the first place.

Interesting Information: Climate Change and the Media

Interesting Information:  September 10, 2012

Climate Change and the Media

YES! Magazine has an interesting article on climate change and the media in it’s Fall 2012 issue:  “Climate Change:  Tipping Point For News Coverage.”  First, Media Matters, a watchdog group, showed that in 2011, the media “spent more than twice as much time talking about Donald Trump as they did about climate change.”  And, the study states that “when they did discuss climate change, the major Sunday news shows (ABC’s This Week, CBS’s Face the Nation, NBC’s Meet the Press, and Fox News Sunday) consulted political and media figures–but not scientists.”

Indeed, “of those interviewed, 50 percent were political figures–including elected officials, strategists and advisers–and 45 percent were from the media.”

A recent poll by the Opinion ResearchCorporation “reveals that nearly 80 percent of Americans want to see more environmental news in mainstream media.”

This trend seemed set to continue until this past summer, 2012–which was filled with extreme weather events like the “destructive wildfires in Colorado.”  And, I would add, the drought that has seriously hurt grain and soy crops.

But, reports YES!, on July 10, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) released its FIRST report “linking the likelihood of extreme weather events to human-made climate change.”

ABC news followed with a report showing “footage of hurricanes, tornadoes, and melting ice fields” and called the just-lived 12 months ” `the hottest 12 months we’ve eve lived through.’ “

So, why did/does the media ignore scientists and keep the fiction of climate warming as a hoax alive–when the only scientists still arguing that climate change is “normal” are being paid by the extraction industries?  First, to increase profits, most of the media has fired its researchers and its experts in many areas–including its science reporters.  Those experts have been supplanted by “talking head” stars, many of whom have no scientific credentials and have ideological agendas that benefit them personally.   Second, keeping a so-called battle, like the fake climate-change battle, alive sells papers and attracts ideological viewers.

Media has been colonized by capitalism.  Media is no longer about informing the public.  It’s about selling papers and attracting viewers.

This same YES! issue has an interesting statistic, which follows:

“Number of companies controlling 90 percent of the media, 1983:  50.

“Number of companies controlling 90 percent of the media, 2011:  6.

So, within the colonization of media, we also get monopoly formation–which is how so much of the available money today is sucked up by those at the tops of these organizations.

Do we really want  SIX organizations controlling all of our media?  Or our food?  Or most any of the industries you can name?

Competition dies in this kind of scenario.  And, so does truth.  And, so will our democracy, or what’s left of it.

Interesting Information: Infant Formula Contains Genetically Engineered Foods

Interesting Information:  September 9, 2012

Infant Formula Contains Genetically Engineered Foods

I’m recopying in full for you the following piece in the September/October 2012 issue of WELL BEING JOURNAL, page 6.

GE infant Formula and Baby Food

A report by the Institute for Responsible Technology (IRT), www.responsibletechnology.org, states that nearly all of the infant formula on the market (Gerber, Abbott Nutrition Labs, Mead Johnson, Walmart, Kellogg’s), including every one of the millions of bottles distributed free by the government, contains genetically engineered corn or soy, as well as milk from cows injected by bovine growth hormone.

The IRT notes that the FDA doesn’t conduct or require a single safety study on GMOs.  They allow Monsanto and other biotech companies to do their own safety tests.  IRT suggests that readers keep in mind that the FDA also assured the public that products such as DDT, PCBs and Agent Orange were perfectly safe long before these products were found to be unsafe and banned.  Today, companies can put GMOs into baby bottles, sippy cups, and breakfast cereal, without even telling the FDA or consumers.

IRT asserts that because of their less-developed immune systems and blood brain barrier, infants and  young children are more sensitive to toxins found in GMOs.  IRT states that diseases linked to GMOs in animal-feeding studies are skyrocketing among America’s children, and this can’t be a coincidence.  The young’s disorders include the same ones identified in GMO animal feeding studies by the physicians group, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine. Consider organically produced baby foods.

The Weston A. Price Foundation folks have some excellent recipes for making your own baby formula.  And, of course, you can make your own baby food quite easily.  You don’t need to buy baby food for your baby–feed them what you are eating, but mash it up fine.  And, remember, do not give babies grains/cereals until they get their big back teeth.  They do not have the enzymes to process them until their systems get more mature.

 

Interesting Information: Dangerous Cross Reactivity: Soy/Peanuts

Interesting Information:  August 4, 2012

Dangerous Cross Reactivity:  Soy/Peanuts

This information on cross reactivity is from Kaayla Daniels, writing in WISE TRADITIONS, the journal of the Weston A. Price Foundation, summer 2012.  (Daniel’s book THE WHOLE SOY STORY is the work of someone who has the credentials to read and understand soy studies and the talent to explain the dangers of soy to us in ways we can understand easily, and I will write an essay on it soon.)

Here’s where you can read the article on cross reactivity in full:  http://www.westonaprice.org/soy-alert/the-soy-ling-of-america-second-hand-soy-from-animal-feeds.

The main article is about the amounts of soy showing up in the meat of animals fed a lot of soy and, of course, in eggs.  This has been a worry for me since I read THE WHOLE SOY STORY.  Soy is filled with all kinds of chemicals that are not healthy for people.  And, no, Asians don’t eat all that much soy.  Besides, soy tastes nasty, bitter, and no matter what industry has done, it has not been able to lick this problem or to prove that soy is healthy.  I don’t feed my chickens any soy, so our eggs are soy-free.  If you eat soy, limit it to small amounts of fermented soy:  miso, tempeh, and natto (which you are unlikely to like as it is an acquired taste.)  Tofu is NOT fermented.

The sidebar article, though, is the one I think you should read if you have a peanut allergy or a tree-nut allergy–because you might be subject to a dangerous, if not fatal, allergic reaction to any soy you might eat–and remember that industry is putting soy into everything it can and is padding meat (hamburger, hot dogs, roasted chickens, etc.), so you could eat soy without knowing it.  If you are eating fast food, you most certainly are eating soy.

The title of the sidebar article is “The Odwalla Chocolate Protein Monster:  The Little Known Soy/Peanut Allergy Connection.”

Back in April of this year, four consumers drank Odwalla’s Chocolate Protein Monster and had severe allergic reactions.  The product was recalled.  Contamination from peanuts was ruled out, so experts started looking at cross reactivity as the cause.  Soy and peanuts are members of the grain-legume botanical family, so people allergic to one are, Daniels writes, “often allergic to the other.”  The Odwalla drink contained soy protein.

Daniels writes that “severe reactions to soy were once rare.  Today they are increasingly common, and pose especially high risks to children already afflicted with peanut allergies.”  In 1999, four children in Sweden died of the soy/peanut link.  Other risk factors include “other food allergies, a family history of peanut or soy allergies, a diagnosis of asthma, rhinitis or eczema, and/or a family history of those diseases.”  Researchers “found it took only a tiny, almost indiscernible, amount of soy to create a severe and even life-threatening reaction in susceptible individuals.”  Worse, they found that “severe allergic reactions could happen suddenly and unexpectedly to people with no known soy allergies.”  The Swedish National Food Administration issued warnings.

Daniels laments the fact that Sweden’s warning has “not been publicized much in the U.S.  Indeed, the Soyfoods Association of North America–and even many allergy support groups–recommend soy nut butter and soy nuts for children allergic to peanuts and tree nuts.  As a result, few people have heard of the deadly soy/peanut connection, and numerous adverse reactions have been reported.”

Daniels chronicles several deaths to this cross reaction here in the U.S.

But, why is this severe reaction happening now?

Daniels answers:  “The main reason appears to be the increased number of allergenic proteins found in genetically modified (GMO) soy.”  Apparently, genetic engineering of soy has produced a soy allergen that is “41 percent identical to a known peanut allergen, ara h 3.”  This new allergen is “recognized by 44 percent of peanut allergic individuals.”  And, in the U.S., “90 percent of soy now contains these new proteins, chemicals and allergens.”  (I think almost 100 percent of the soy crop is now GMO–I have to check that fact.)

As soy ingredients are now in “60 percent of processed or packaged foods and nearly 100 percent of fast foods,” writes Daniels, not issuing a warning “is simply irresponsible.”  And, here’s a devastating piece of information:  “Not surprisingly, the reason appears to be the usual principle of profits over people.  According to Robyn O’Brien [AllergyKids website], “`Leading pediatric allergists and researchers have been funded by the agrichemical corporation responsible for engineering these proteins, chemicals and toxins into soy.'”

Note that soy has not yet been identified officially  in the Odwalla Chocolate Protein Monster case, so Daniels is asking that we all make a “concerted grassroots effort to share this information with as many people as possible.”

PLEASE SHARE THIS INFORMATION ON FACEBOOK OR ELSEWHERE.

PS:  Odwalla drinks are not really a health drink.  Their juices are pasteurized, so all the goodies are killed.  Mostly, you’re just drinking sugar and lots of it.  If you want to drink more veggie juices, get a good juicer.  I wrote about mine here on this blog.  Limit all fruit juices to the barest minimum–the sugar loads are just too great.  There are, surely, better sources of protein than an industry-produced Odwalla drink.